Matematika di Era Digital: Antara Kecanggihan Teknologi dan Penurunan Kemampuan Dasar

Authors

  • Siti Maftuhah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Author
  • Imam Sujarwo Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Author

Keywords:

basic mathematics skills, digital technology, technology dependence, mathematics learning

Abstract

The development of digital technology has changed the way students access and process information in mathematics learning. Although technology provides efficiency in completing tasks, the tendency for over-reliance has resulted in a weakening of basic mathematical skills, particularly numeracy skills and conceptual understanding. This study aims to analyze this phenomenon through a descriptive qualitative approach. The research subjects included 25 eighth-grade students and a mathematics teacher at MTs Nurul Huda Singosari. Data were obtained through observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. The results showed that the use of digital calculators, problem-solving applications, and search engines led to a decline in students' ability to solve problems manually and construct logical solution steps. These findings emphasize the need for pedagogical strategies that balance the use of technology with strengthening fundamental mathematical skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823

Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2019). The effectiveness of educational technology applications on mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 27, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran (Edisi Keempat). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbudristek. (2021). Studi kemampuan numerasi siswa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2019). Revisiting the relationship between cell phone use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.012

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Papadakis, S. (2020). Tools for evaluating educational apps for young children: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–14.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Wahyudin. (2021). Pengaruh teknologi digital dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 9(2), 123–134.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-06

How to Cite

Matematika di Era Digital: Antara Kecanggihan Teknologi dan Penurunan Kemampuan Dasar. (2025). Advances In Education Journal , 2(3), 1051-1057. https://journal.al-afif.org/index.php/aej/article/view/423

Similar Articles

1-10 of 126

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.