Problematika Metodologis Bab III dalam Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Analisis Desain, Instrumen, dan Prosedur Penelitian

Authors

  • Faiqotul Magfirotus Syam Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember Author
  • Imron Fauzi Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember Author
  • Indah Nurmalasari Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember Author
  • Mutiara Tazkiyah Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember Author
  • Sofiatul Riski Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember Author

Keywords:

Classroom Action Research; methodological issues; research design; research instruments; data analysis; reflective practice; evidence-based teaching

Abstract

This study aims to conceptually examine methodological issues in Classroom Action Research (CAR), particularly focusing on deviations in research design implementation, weaknesses in instrument development and validation, inconsistencies in research procedures, and limitations in data analysis and evidence-based reflection. This research employs a library research method using a descriptive qualitative approach. The literature selection process was conducted systematically through academic databases such as Google Scholar and indexed journals by applying keywords including “classroom action research,” “CAR methodology,” and “data analysis in CAR.” The inclusion criteria consisted of peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024, relevance to the research focus, and clear methodological descriptions. Based on this process, a total of 20 scientific articles were selected and analyzed. Data analysis was carried out through stages of data collection, reduction, categorization, and synthesis of findings. The results reveal five major themes of methodological problems in CAR: (1) inconsistency in the implementation of cyclical research design, (2) weaknesses in the development and validation of research instruments, (3) lack of systematic research procedures, (4) limited teacher competence in data analysis, and (5) insufficient integration of data in reflective processes. These findings indicate a lack of methodological integration among design, instruments, and procedures in CAR. practice. This study contributes theoretically by reinforcing CAR as an integrated methodological system that requires alignment between design, instruments, procedures, and data analysis. The novelty of this research lies in proposing a conceptual framework emphasizing methodological integration as the key to improving CAR quality. Practically, this study provides insights for enhancing teachers’ research competence to support evidence-based instructional improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisy, M. M., Nurjanah, N., Febriana, S. R., & Octaviani, W. (2024). Meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam melalui penelitian tindakan kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Muta'allimin, 1(2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.25299/jpim.2024.14901

Alfiyah, N., Chalisah, N. D., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2025). Validity and reliability of instruments: Students’ perception of Google Classroom and interest in learning Islamic religion. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 11(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v11i1.52521

Arslan, A. (2020). Reliability and validity of instruments measuring English teachers’ TPACK. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.679876

Badrudin., & Fauzi, I. (2022). Tips dan Trik Menulis Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

Darmadi, D., Rifai, M., Rositasari, F., & Haryati, N. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) di Sekolah. MARAS: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v2i1.161

Deda, Y. N., et al. (2023). Penggunaan media pembelajaran dalam penelitian tindakan kelas. Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.18592/ptk.v10i1.12016

Destini, F., Hariyanto, Syafrudin, U., Pangestu, D., & Nabila, N. A. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Membaca Pemahaman Peserta Didik Kelas Tinggi. PTK: Jurnal Tindakan Kelas, 5(1), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.53624/ptk.v5i1.514

Elan, E., Sumardi, S., & Juandi, A. S. (2022). Penyusunan instrumen penelitian tindakan kelas dalam upaya peningkatan keterampilan sosial. Jurnal PAUD Agapedia, 6(1), 92-93. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpa.v6i1.51339

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Khasinah, S. (2013). Classroom action research. Pionir: Jurnal Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v4i1.159

Mahardiyanti, T. (2024). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. PTK: Jurnal Tindakan Kelas, 5(1), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.53624/ptk.v5i1.537

Mertler, C. A. (2019). Introduction to educational research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544302065

Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315186146

Putri, Y., et al. (2023). Konsep dasar penelitian tindakan kelas. Belaindika: Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Inovasi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.52005/belaindika.v5i2.119

Restalillah, R. (2024). Strategi mengatasi tantangan dalam penelitian tindakan kelas. PTK: Jurnal Tindakan Kelas. https://doi.org/10.53624/ptk.v6i1.660

Saenab, S. A., & Savitri, D. I. (2023). Penerapan TaRL dalam penelitian tindakan kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i04.19957

Saputra, N. (2021). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.

Saputri, H. A., Zulhijrah, & Larasati, N. J. (2023). Analisis instrumen asesmen: Validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran dan daya beda butir soal. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i5.2268

Siregar, I., Khairunnisa, S., Nurfadilah, A., & Mawahda, A. (2024). Analisis Data Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. QOUBA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.61104/qouba.v1i1.111

Sitorus, S. (2021). Penelitian tindakan kelas berbasis kolaborasi (Analisis prosedur, implementasi dan penulisan laporan). AUD Cendekia: Journal of Islamic Early Childhood Education, 1(3), 200-213. https://doi.org/10.53802/audcendekia.v1i3.140

Sugiharni, G. A. D., & Setiasih, N. W. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen evaluasi blended learning matematika diskrit. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v1i2.2626

Susilawati, S., & Hasibuan, A. (2024). Penerapan model NHT dalam penelitian tindakan kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i1.13405

Susilowati, D. (2018). Penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK) solusi alternatif problematika pembelajaran. Edunomika, 2(1), 41-45. https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v2i01.175

Utomo, P., Asvio, N., & Prayogi, F. (2024). Metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK): Panduan Praktis untuk Guru dan Mahasiswa di Institusi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.47134/ptk.v1i4.821

Widayati, A. (2008). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 6(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v6i1.1793

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Problematika Metodologis Bab III dalam Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Analisis Desain, Instrumen, dan Prosedur Penelitian. (2026). Advances In Education Journal , 2(6), 1-14. https://journal.al-afif.org/index.php/aej/article/view/1047

Similar Articles

91-100 of 356

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.