Relasi guru dan peserta didik dalam perspektif teori pendidikan kontemporer: dari otoritas menuju shared pedagogical responsibility

Authors

  • Muhishah Hidayati Institut Ahmad Dahlan, Probolinggo, Indonesia Author
  • Ahsan Hakim Institut Ahmad Dahlan, Probolinggo, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

relasi guru-peserta didik, teacher authority, student agency, autonomy support, student-centred learning.

Abstract

Teacher student relationships are fundamental to education because they determine how authority, responsibility, participation, and decision-making are distributed within learning processes. Contemporary educational paradigms indicate a shift from teacher-dominated relationships toward more dialogic, participatory, and agency-oriented pedagogical relationships. This article aims to analyze the transformation of teacher–student relationships from the perspective of contemporary educational theories by examining teacher authority, student agency, autonomy support, student-centred learning, and shared pedagogical responsibility. This study employs a literature review method by analyzing relevant international journal articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. The findings indicate that the shift toward student-centred learning does not require the elimination of teacher authority. Instead, teacher authority is transformed from control into pedagogical guidance through structure, direction, support, scaffolding, and feedback. Existing literature also indicates positive relationships between teacher autonomy support and motivation, engagement, self-regulated learning, and other learning outcomes. Meanwhile, research on student-centred learning shows that educational practices still emphasize student activation and engagement more strongly than student agency and autonomy. The main finding suggests that shared pedagogical responsibility can serve as a conceptual framework for bridging teacher authority and student agency. Teachers remain professionally responsible for the direction and quality of learning, while students gradually assume greater responsibility for making choices, managing learning, reflecting on processes, and evaluating learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brinkworth, M. E., McIntyre, J., Juraschek, A. D., & Gehlbach, H. (2018). Teacher-student relationships: The positives and negatives of assessing both perspectives. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.09.002.

Endedijk, H. M., Breeman, L. D., van Lissa, C. J., Hendrickx, M. M. H. G., den Boer, L., & Mainhard, T. (2022). The teacher's invisible hand: A meta-analysis of the relevance of teacher-student relationship quality for peer relationships and the contribution of student behavior. Review of Educational Research, 92(3). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211051428.

Elliott, J. G. (2009). The nature of teacher authority and teacher expertise. Support for Learning, 24(4), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2009.01429.x.

Hansson, Å. (2010). Instructional responsibility in mathematics education: Modelling classroom teaching using Swedish data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9249-2.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001.

Kincade, L., Cook, C., & Goerdt, A. (2020). Meta-analysis and common practice elements of universal approaches to improving student-teacher relationships. Review of Educational Research, 90(5). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320946836.

Mameli, C., Grazia, V., & Molinari, L. (2023). Student agency: Theoretical elaborations and implications for research and practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 122, 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102258.

Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2023). Teacher autonomy support influence on online learning engagement: The mediating roles of self-efficacy and self-regulated learning. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217737.

Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2). https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434.

Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2017). Affective teacher-student relationships and students' engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3.

Yang, D., Chen, P., Wang, H., Wang, K., & Huang, R. (2022). Teachers' autonomy support and student engagement: A systematic literature review of longitudinal studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955.

Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2026). Teacher authority, responsibility, and platform governance in generative AI-supported classrooms. Discover Education, 5, 1040.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

Relasi guru dan peserta didik dalam perspektif teori pendidikan kontemporer: dari otoritas menuju shared pedagogical responsibility. (2026). Al-Ilmiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 504-511. https://journal.al-afif.org/index.php/al-ilmiya/article/view/1717

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

41-50 of 419

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.