Psycholinguistics In a Digital Perspective: The Influence of social media On Language Production

Authors

  • Rini Lubis STAIN MADINA Author
  • Muhammad Hasyimsyah Batubara hasyimsyah STAIN MADINA Author

Keywords:

Social media,language production,digital communication, cognition

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has brought significant changes to the way people interact and use language, particularly through social media, which has now become a major space for self-expression and shaping linguistic habits. This study aims to analyze the influence of social media on human language production from a psycholinguistic perspective. The research was conducted using a descriptive qualitative approach through digital observations and semi-structured interviews with fifth-semester students of the English Education Program. The findings indicate that social media affects students’ language production in several ways: sentence structures become simpler, register shifts occur, language is produced more quickly, and academic accuracy tends to decrease. Nevertheless, students are still able to adapt and return to using formal language when required by the context. These findings also open opportunities for further research on how digital habits relate to academic literacy skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Routledge.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.

Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton.

Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Field, J. (2003). Psycholinguistics: The key concepts. Routledge.

Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In D. Tannen & A. M. Tester (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 1–25). Wiley-Blackwell.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.

Ling, R., & Baron, N. (2007). Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 291–298.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340.

Sutherland, W. (2018). Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. HarperCollins.

Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Psycholinguistics In a Digital Perspective: The Influence of social media On Language Production. (2025). Advances In Education Journal , 2(3), 1410-1418. https://journal.al-afif.org/index.php/aej/article/view/513

Similar Articles

1-10 of 191

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.