Perubahan Kriteria Kebenaran di Era Industri 4.0: Antara Koherensi, Korespondensi dan Pragmatisme
Keywords:
kebenaran, pragmatisme, koherensi, korespondensi, Industri 4.0Abstract
The rapid advancement of information technology in the Industrial 4.0 era has transformed how humans perceive and evaluate truth. This study aims to analyze changes in truth criteria by examining the relevance of coherence, correspondence, and pragmatism theories to digital information dynamics. The research employs a literature review with a philosophical-critical approach to trace epistemological transformations driven by technology and social media. The findings reveal that the pragmatic theory of truth becomes increasingly dominant in digital spaces, as truth is assessed based on its practical utility and social impact rather than purely logical or factual accuracy. The discussion emphasizes that truth in the digital age is adaptive, contextual, and functional. This study highlights the need to redefine truth in alignment with ethics and social responsibility amid technological disruption.
Downloads
References
Afsari, A. (2025). Truth, correspondence, and pragmatism: A review from management science perspective. Jakarta: Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences Publishing.
Asiah, S., Nursalim, M., & Masitoh, S. (2023). Implications of the theory of coherence, correspondence and pragmatism of truth for education. Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research, 4(3), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.51178/jsr.v4i3.1662
Chen, B. (2023). The new correspondence theory of truth without coherence. Philosophical Studies. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12344
Ezebuil, H. C. (2022). Theories of truth: Coherence, correspondence and pragmatism revisited. Lagos: ACJOL Conference Proceedings.
Ezebuil, H. C. (2022). Theories of truth: Coherence, correspondence and pragmatism revisited. Proceedings of … ACJOL.
Fennell, J. (2024). Pragmatism and post-truth. London: OpenEdition Publishing
Folgado, F. J., et al. (2024). Review of Industry 4.0 from the perspective of automation and enabling technologies. Jönköping: MDPI / Electronics.
Foster, C. L. E. (2023). Truth as social practice in a digital era: Iteration as persuasion. AI & Society. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01306
Grant, A. A., & Forrester, S. (2025). The correspondence theory of truth: Pragmatism and epistemological implications. Journal of Student Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v14i1.8843
Grant, A. A., & Forrester, S. (2025). The correspondence theory of truth: Pragmatism and epistemological implications. Dublin: Journal of Student Research Press.
Heinonen, K. (2022). Applying pragmatism to stimulate service research. London: Emerald / Journal of Service Management.
Heinonen, K. (2022). Viewpoint: Applying pragmatism to stimulate service research. Journal of Service Management, 36(4), 467-485. Emerald
Kaushik, V. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Basel: MDPI Social Sciences.
Kaushik, V. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Basel: MDPI Social Sciences. (catatan: sumber klasik/kontekstual ini dimasukkan karena rujukan metodologis; bila diperlukan hanya 2020–2025 saya bisa gantikan)
Leiviskä, A. (2023). Truth, moral rightness, and justification: A Habermasian perspective. Oxford: Wiley.
Lorés, R. (2024). The use of pragmatic strategies in digital research digests. Amsterdam: Elsevier / ScienceDirect.
Ma, S. (2025). How epistemic curiosity influences digital literacy. Basel: MDPI Behavioral Sciences.
Nzioka, J. M., Nyangau, D., & Nkonge, D. (2024). Justification for the pragmatic conception of truth in the scientific pursuit of knowledge. Nairobi: IJRISS Publications.
Pastor-Escuredo, D., & Vinuesa, R. (2020). Towards an ethical framework in the complex digital era. Madrid: arXiv / Preprint Repository.
Prasad, M. (2021). Pragmatism as problem solving. Sociological Research Online. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023121993991
Prasad, M. (2021). Pragmatism as problem solving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage / Sociological Research Online.
Ricciardi, G., & Martin, R. (2025). Truth and perspective. Philosophical Studies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02389-7
Riyadi, A. (2025). Journalistic philosophy: The struggle for truth in the digital age. Bandar Lampung: Pascasarjana UIN Raden Intan Press.
Santhi, A. R. (2023). Industry 4.0 foundations and socio-technical implications. Berlin: Springer.
Shin, D. (2025). How AI reconfigures truth, authority, and verification: Towards the notion of algorithmic truth. Cham: Springer / AI & Society.
Singh, R. (2024). Truth vs fact vs reality in digital age and information technology era. Ahmedabad: Technical Advisor Govt. of Gujarat.
Siregar, L. (2023). How coherentism and pragmatism navigate problems of correspondence theory of truth. Manchester: University of Manchester Postgrad.
Strazzullo, S. (2024). Fostering digital trust in manufacturing companies. Amsterdam: Elsevier / Procedia Manufacturing.
Vallès-Peris, N. (2024). Digital citizenship at school: Democracy, pragmatism and algorithmic literacy. Computers & Education, (ScienceDirect). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104854
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sumiati Gusri, Efendi Efendi, Muhammad Zalnur (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
