Matriks Analisis Data Kualitatif Manual (MADKM):Kerangka Operasional Integratif dalam Riset Sosial Kontemporer

Authors

  • Obi Pratama Universitas Wanita Internasional, Kota Bandung, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

qualitative data analysis; coding; thematic analysis; analytical transparency; MADKM

Abstract

Qualitative data analysis constitutes the core of qualitative research; however, methodological traditions often develop in isolation, making it difficult for researchers to establish transparent and systematic analytical procedures. This study aims to develop the Manual Qualitative data analysis Matrix (MADKM) as an integrative operational framework that bridges the transformation of raw data into research findings. Employing an integrative methodological synthesis approach, the study synthesizes major traditions in qualitative data analysis, including interactive analysis, coding analysis, thematic analysis, framework analysis, and audit trail approaches. The findings reveal a conceptual fragmentation within the qualitative analysis literature, where data reduction, coding, categorization, theme development, data display, and analytical transparency are frequently discussed as separate methodological components. In response to this gap, the study proposes MADKM, which consists of six interconnected stages: raw data, coding, categorization, themes, analytical findings, and conclusions. The framework provides a traceable analytical pathway that strengthens transparency and consistency throughout the qualitative research process. The study concludes that MADKM contributes as an integrative operational framework that consolidates diverse traditions of qualitative data analysis into a practical manual format suitable for contemporary social research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Carcary, M. (2009). The Research Audit Trail: Enhancing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Inquiry. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7(1), 11–24.

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(117), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117

Kalpokaite, N., & Radivojevic, I. (2019). Demystifying qualitative data analysis for novice qualitative researchers. The Qualitative Report, 24(13), 44–57.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Maher, C., Hadfield, M., Hutchings, M., & de Eyto, A. (2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–13.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

Matriks Analisis Data Kualitatif Manual (MADKM):Kerangka Operasional Integratif dalam Riset Sosial Kontemporer. (2026). Advances In Education Journal , 2(6), 434-450. https://journal.al-afif.org/index.php/aej/article/view/1244

Similar Articles

51-60 of 324

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.