Analisis Desain Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Kualitas Laporan Penelitian: Kajian Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Stella Dinda Dian Adisti Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia Author
  • Nur Hidayah Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia Author
  • Valentino Rahma Febrian Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia Author
  • Intan Azzahro Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia Author
  • Imron Fauzi Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, laporan penelitian

Abstract

Classroom Action Research (CAR) is a practice-based research approach that has the potential to improve the quality of learning through a continuous cycle of action and reflection. However, the quantitative growth in CAR publications has not been accompanied by a commensurate improvement in the methodological quality of resulting research reports. This study aims to analyze the design characteristics of CAR and identify factors influencing the quality of research reports. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The literature search was conducted across four international academic databases Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar using a combination of keywords based on Boolean operators. The search yielded 127 articles, which were screened through three stages based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 10 articles for further analysis. Data synthesis was conducted using a thematic narrative synthesis approach. The results indicate that most CAR research is oriented toward improving learning outcomes, however, recurring methodological weaknesses were identified, including: unclear problem formulations, weak coherence between action design and research objectives, limitations in data analysis techniques, and insufficient depth in the reflection process. This study contributes to the development of an evaluative framework for CAR designs that can serve as a reference for researchers in improving methodological standards and scientific credibility of CAR reports.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466

Cardinot, D., Moura, C., & Guerra, A. (2023). Challenging the "science from nowhere" perspective in the classroom: Action research about a historical case of Brazilian science. Science & Education, 32(2), 327-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00311-1

Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2019). Action research in education: A practical guide (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE 2007-001). Keele University.

Kumwichar, P. (2023). Enhancing learning about epidemiological data analysis using R for graduate students in medical fields with Jupyter Notebook: Classroom action research. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e47394. https://doi.org/10.2196/47394

Mertler, C. A. (2024). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050

Saptono, B., Herwin, H., & Dahalan, S. C. (2023). VideoScribe's sparkol-based learning to improve learning outcomes: A classroom action research. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(4), 749-756. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.4.1863

Tulung, J. M., Waney, M., Mailool, J., Rogahang, H. J., Weol, W., & Wuwung, O. (2022). Teachers' difficulties in implementing classroom action research: Experiences of elementary school teachers. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(6), 1957-1971. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7486

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

Analisis Desain Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Kualitas Laporan Penelitian: Kajian Systematic Literature Review. (2026). Advances In Education Journal , 2(6), 451-459. https://journal.al-afif.org/index.php/aej/article/view/1222

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

21-30 of 160

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.